Schools · Politics · No. 141
An extended family working one field together, equality shown as a shared harvest

Ujamaa

1962 – 1985

Socialism as an extension of the extended family rather than an import from Europe, tried at national scale and largely failed.

Active
1962 – 1985
Where
Tanzania
Also
ujamaa
Status
extinct
Tradition
African
Difficulty
Originality
Influence
Reach
Relevance

The claim

Ujamaa means familyhood. The obligations that hold within an extended family — mutual support, shared work, nobody destitute while others eat — are the model for a society, and they do not need to be imported.

What it held

Nyerere's argument is that African societies were already socialist in the sense that mattered: nobody starved while a relative had food, land was held for use rather than accumulation, and everyone able to work did. Capitalism and doctrinaire Marxism are both foreign; ujamaa is a recovery.

The philosophical content is a claim about the person. Ujamaa rejects both the isolated individual and the class-defined member. A person is a member of a family with obligations both ways, and a society organised on that footing needs neither exploitation nor class war.

The Arusha Declaration of 1967 turned this into policy: nationalisation, a leadership code forbidding officials from holding second incomes or rental property, and a national programme of villagisation.

The economic results were poor and the villagisation was in large part compulsory, which contradicted the philosophy directly — you cannot make people into a family by moving them. Nyerere said so himself afterwards, in one of the more honest political admissions on record, and he had already resigned voluntarily in 1985.

What he did achieve is real: literacy rose sharply, and Tanzania avoided the ethnic fragmentation that broke several neighbours.

How it argued

Political writing in Swahili and English aimed at a general readership, combined with implementation as national policy.

What it was arguing against

Capitalism as importing exploitation, and orthodox Marxism as importing a class struggle Nyerere argued Tanzania did not have.

Where it disagreed with itself

Whether traditional African societies were as egalitarian as the argument requires. Whether the failure was of the philosophy or of the coercion used to implement it.

Common misconceptions

That Nyerere defended the outcome. He acknowledged the failures explicitly and said the villagisation had been forced when it should not have been.

How it began

A schoolteacher who led Tanganyika to independence, translated Shakespeare into Swahili, and wrote his political philosophy in both languages.

What became of it

Abandoned in the 1980s under economic pressure. Nyerere had already resigned the presidency voluntarily, which almost nobody in the region did.

Lasting influence

African socialist thought broadly. Its literacy and nation-building record is cited independently of its economics.

Why it still matters

It is the clearest case of a philosophical argument implemented as national policy, with results that can be assessed — which is rarer than it should be.

Put another way

An extended family in which nobody eats while a cousin is hungry, scaled up to twenty million people.

Where to start

The title essay. It is a dozen pages and states the whole position.

The surprising bit

Nyerere translated Julius Caesar and The Merchant of Venice into Swahili, and stepped down from the presidency voluntarily in 1985 having concluded his economic policy had failed.

In their own words

We in Africa have no more need of being converted to socialism than we have of being taught democracy.

Nyerere, Ujamaa

Ujamaa describes our socialism. It is opposed to capitalism, and it is equally opposed to doctrinaire socialism.

Nyerere, Ujamaa

Connections

Opposed by
Objectivism

The verdict

A humane philosophy, an honest self-assessment, and an economic record that does not support it.

Sources